Libertarian Links
Positive Rights
Quotes
The gun in....
Essay Archive
Search  

Capital Goods and Capital

 

MyCanadaWEST

" Does David Suzuki have an agenda? Of course he has an agenda. Does he make more money scaring the hell out of us, or watching fruit flies fornicate.  He makes a good living predicting human caused environmental disasters, none of which will actually occur."
a Canadian citizen who isn't taken in.

"Trudeau turned Canada from a nation of hard-working, self-reliant and patriotic individuals, into a collection of whiners and moaners and self-declared victims. He left us a smaller Canada run by even smaller men."
A citizen of Saskatchewan when asked what the late Trudeau's legacy would be

 

Commencement Speech

 

Many commencement speeches are boringly predictable. Neal Boortz is a Texan, a lawyer, a Texas AGGIE, and now a nationally syndicated talk show host from Atlanta . His speech is far different from what either the students or the faculty expected . Agree or not, his views are thought provoking.

It would have been particularly entertaining to have witnessed the faculty's reaction! Don't stop reading if and when you find things that disturb you, you'll find other stuff that you'll find genuinely part of the reality of life in the Untied States of America and Canada.


His Commencement Address


"I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august occasion. It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to impress you; you'll have enough smoke blown up your bloomers today. And you can bet your tassels I'm not here to impress the faculty and administration.

You may not like much of what I have to say, and that's fine. You will remember it though. Especially after about 10 years out there in the real world. This, it goes without saying, does not apply to those of you who will seek your careers and your fortunes as government employees.

This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old saying that those who can - do. Those who can't - teach. That sounds deliciously insensitive. But there is often raw truth in insensitivity, just as you often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in compassion. Say good-bye to your faculty because now you are getting ready to go out there and do. These folks behind me are going to stay right here and teach.

By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma doesn't mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed me my private pilot's license many years ago, he said, 'Here, this is your ticket to learn.' The same can be said for your diploma. Believe me, the learning has just begun.

Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact, you are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much. You feel so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a compassionate and caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just so extraordinarily special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any to be a liberal; as good a time as any to know absolutely everything. You have plenty of time, starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in.

Over the next few years, as you begin to feel the cold breath of reality down your neck, things are going to start changing pretty fast... including your own assessment of just how much you really know.

So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality: Pay attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then, compare the words of the left to the words and phrases you hear from those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives. From the Left you will hear "I feel."
From the Right you will hear "I think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups -- The Blacks, the Poor, The Rich, The Disadvantaged, The Less Fortunate. From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.

That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics. Conservatives and Libertarians think -- and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their identity is centered on the individual.

Liberals feel that their favored groups have enforceable rights to the property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives and Libertarians, I among them I might add, think that individuals have the right to protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses.

In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at your diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on them. Not the name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or sorority, but your name. Your group identity is going away. Your recognition and appreciation of your individual identity starts now.

If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself to be a libertarian or a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can and apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open arms. They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed an individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign on to the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.

Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your eyes. You're going to actually get a full time job!

You're also going to get a lifelong work partner. This partner isn't going to help you do your job. This partner is just going to sit back and wait for payday. This partner doesn't want to share in your effort, but in your earnings.

Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent; an agent representing a strange and diverse group of people; an agent for every teenager with an illegitimate child; an agent for a research scientist who wanted to make some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys grind their teeth. An agent for some poor demented hippie who considers herself to be a meaningful and talented artist, but who just can't manage to sell any of her artwork on the open market.

Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any, job skills, but who wanted a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn dictators in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign aid. An agent for multi-million- dollar companies who want someone else to pay for their overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who wants to use the unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal enrichment and benefit.

That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive government. Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power this agent has. Power that you do not have A power that no individual has, or will have. This agent has the legal power to use force, deadly force, to accomplish its goals.

You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to you, introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill out, and move right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton gorilla. It will sleep anywhere it wants to.

Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become successful it will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm sorry, there just isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder, and you can't decrease his share of your income. That power rests with him, not you.

So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong to fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise government, for government is inherently evil. Yes ... a necessary evil, but dangerous nonetheless ... somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that in the proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can be fatal.

Now let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds at this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon as possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but they fail miserably out there in the real world.

First is that favorite buzz word of the media, government and academia: Diversity! You have been taught that the real value of any group of people - be it a social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever - is based on diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because diversity is based not on an individual's abilities or character, but on a person's identity and status as a member of a group. Yes, it's that liberal group identity thing again.

Within the great diversity movement, group identification - be it racial, gender based, or some other minority status - means more than the individual's integrity, character or other qualifications.

Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere, where diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual achievement and excellence actually count. No matter what your professors have taught you over the last four years, you are about to learn that diversity is absolutely no replacement for excellence, ability, and individual hard work. From this day on every single time you hear the word "diversity" you can rest assured that there is someone close by who is determined to rob you of every vestige of individuality you possess.

We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We have witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last few decades, usually emanating from college campuses.

You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place to live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The right to an education. You probably even have your own pet right - the right to a Beemer for instance, or the right to have someone else provide for that child you plan on downloading in a year or so.

Forget it. Forget those rights! I'll tell you what your rights are! You have a right to live free, and to the results of 60% -75% of your labor. I'll also tell you have no right to any portion of the life or labor of another.

You may, for instance, think that you have a right to health care. After all, Hillary said so, didn't she? But you cannot receive healthcare unless some doctor or health practitioner surrenders some of his time - his life - to you. He may be willing to do this for compensation, but that's his choice. You have no "right" to his time or property. You have no right to his or any other person's life or to any portion thereof.

You may also think you have some "right" to a job; a job with a living wage, whatever that is. Do you mean to tell me that you have a right to force your services on another person, and then the right to demand that this person compensate you with their money? Sorry, forget it. I am sure you would scream if some urban outdoorsmen (that would be "homeless person" for those of you who don't want to give these less fortunate people a romantic and adventurous title) came to you and demanded his job and your money.

The people who have been telling you about all the rights you have are simply exercising one of theirs - the right to be imbeciles. Their being imbeciles didn't cost anyone else either property or time. It's their right, and they exercise it brilliantly.

By the way, did you catch my use of the phrase "less fortunate" a bit ago when I was talking about the urban outdoorsmen? That phrase is a favorite of the Left. Think about it, and you'll understand why.

To imply that one person is homeless, destitute, dirty, drunk, spaced out on drugs, unemployable, and generally miserable because he is "less fortunate" is to imply that a successful person - one with a job, a home and a future - is in that position because he or she was "fortunate." The dictionary says that fortunate means "having derived good from an unexpected place." There is nothing unexpected about deriving good from hard work. There is also nothing unexpected about deriving misery from choosing drugs, alcohol, and the street.

If the Liberal Left can create the common perception that success and failure are simple matters of "fortune" or "luck," then it is easy to promote and justify their various income redistribution schemes. After all, we are just evening out the odds a little bit. This "success equals luck" idea the liberals like to push is seen everywhere. Former Democratic presidential candidate Richard Gephardt refers to high-achievers as "people who have won life's lottery." He wants you to believe they are making the big bucks because they are lucky. It's not luck, my friends. It's choice.

One of the greatest lessons I ever learned was in a book by Og Mandingo, entitled "The Greatest Secret in the World." The lesson? Very simple: "Use wisely your power of choice."

That bum sitting on a heating grate, smelling like a wharf rat? He's there by choice. He is there because of the sum total of the choices he has made in his life. This truism is absolutely the hardest thing for some people to accept, especially those who consider themselves to be victims of something or other - victims of discrimination, bad luck, the system, capitalism, whatever. After all, nobody really wants to accept the blame for his or her position in life. Not when it is so much easier to point and say, "Look! He did this to me!" than it is to look into a mirror and say, "You S. O. B.! You did this to me!"

The key to accepting responsibility for your life is to accept the fact that your choices, every one of them, are leading you inexorably to either success or failure, however you define those terms.

Some of the choices are obvious: Whether or not to stay in school. Whether or not to get pregnant. Whether or not to hit the bottle. Whether or not to keep this job you hate until you get another better-paying job. Whether or not to save some of your money, or saddle yourself with huge payments for that new car.

Some of the choices are seemingly insignificant: Whom to go to the movies with. Whose car to ride home in. Whether to watch the tube tonight, or read a book on investing. But, and you can be sure of this, each choice counts. Each choice is a building block - some large, some small. But each one is a part of the structure of your life. If you make the right choices, or if you make more right choices than wrong ones, something absolutely terrible may happen to you. Something unthinkable. You, my friend, could become one of the hated, the evil, the ugly, the feared, the filthy, the successful, the rich.

The rich basically serve two purposes in this country. First, they provide the investments, the investment capital, and the brains for the formation of new businesses. Businesses that hire people. Businesses that send millions of paychecks home each week to the un-rich.

Second, the rich are a wonderful object of ridicule, distrust, and hatred. Few things are more valuable to a politician than the envy most Americans feel for the evil rich.

Envy is a powerful emotion. Even more powerful than the emotional minefield that surrounded Bill Clinton when he reviewed his last batch of White House interns. Politicians use envy to get votes and power. And they keep that power by promising the envious that the envied will be punished: "The rich will pay their fair share of taxes if I have anything to do with it. The truth is that the top 10% of income earners in this country pay almost 50% of all income taxes collected. I shudder to think what these job producers would be paying if our tax system were any more "fair."

You have heard, no doubt, that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Interestingly enough, our government's own numbers show that many of the poor actually get richer, and that quite a few of the rich actually get poorer. But for the rich who do actually get richer, and the poor who remain poor ... there's an explanation -- a reason. The rich, you see, keep doing the things that make them rich; while the poor keep doing the things that make them poor.

Speaking of the poor, during your adult life you are going to hear an endless string of politicians bemoaning the plight of the poor. So, you need to know that under our government's definition of "poor" you can have a $5 million net worth, a $300,000 home and a new $90,000 Mercedes, all completely paid for. You can also have a maid, cook, and valet, and $1 million in your checking account, and you can still be officially defined by our government as "living in poverty." Now there's something you haven't seen on the evening news.

How does the government pull this one off? Very simple, really. To determine whether or not some poor soul is "living in poverty," the government measures one thing -- just one thing. Income. It doesn't matter one bit how much you have, how much you own, how many cars you drive or how big they are, whether or not your pool is heated, whether you winter in Aspen and spend the summers in the Bahamas, or how much is in your savings account. It only matters how much income you claim in that particular year. This means that if you take a one-year leave of absence from your high-paying job and decide to live off the money in your savings and checking accounts while you write the next great American novel, the government says you are 'living in poverty."

This isn't exactly what you had in mind when you heard these gloomy statistics, is it? Do you need more convincing? Try this. The government's own statistics show that people who are said to be "living in poverty" spend more than $1.50 for each dollar of income they claim. Something is a bit fishy here. Just remember all this the next time Charles Gibson tells you about some hideous new poverty statistics.

Why has the government concocted this phony poverty scam? Because the government needs an excuse to grow and to expand its social welfare programs, which translates into an expansion of its power. If the government can convince you, in all your compassion, that the number of "poor" is increasing, it will have all the excuse it needs to sway an electorate suffering from the advanced stages of Obsessive-Compulsive Compassion Disorder.

I'm about to be stoned by the faculty here. They've already changed their minds about that honorary degree I was going to get. That's OK, though. I still have my PhD. in Insensitivity from the Neal Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training. I learned that, in short, sensitivity sucks. It's a trap. Think about it - the truth knows no sensitivity. Life can be insensitive. Wallow too much in sensitivity and you'll be unable to deal with life, or the truth So, get over it.

Now, before the dean has me shackled and hauled off, I have a few random thoughts.

* You need to register to vote, unless you are on welfare. If you are living off the efforts of others, please do us the favor of sitting down and shutting up until you are on your own again.

* When you do vote, your votes for the House and the Senate are more important than your vote for president. The House controls the purse strings, so concentrate your awareness there.

* Liars cannot be trusted, even when the liar is the president of the country. If someone can't deal honestly with you, send him packing.

* Don't bow to the temptation to use the government as an instrument of plunder. If it is wrong for you to take money from someone else who earned it -- to take their money by force for your own needs -- then it is certainly just as wrong for you to demand that the government step forward and do this dirty work for you.

* Don't look in other people's pockets. You have no business there. What they earn is theirs. What you earn is yours Keep it that way. Nobody owes you anything, except to respect your privacy and your rights, and leave you the hell alone.

* Speaking of earning, the revered 40-hour workweek is for losers. Forty hours should be considered the minimum, not the maximum. You don't see highly successful people clocking out of the office every afternoon at five. The losers are the ones caught up in that afternoon rush hour.
The winners drive home in the dark.


* Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.


* Finally (and aren't you glad to hear that word), as Og Mandino wrote,

1. Proclaim your rarity. Each of you is a rare and unique human being.

2. Use wisely your power of choice.

3. Go the extra mile ... drive home in the dark.


Oh, and put off buying a television set as long as you can. Now, if you have any idea at all what's good for you, you will get the hell out of here and never come back.


Class dismissed"
 

Global Warming and other lies the Green Meanies Told Me

 

 

Al Gore’s ‘good lies’ | spiked

The Best Of Al Gore's Lies And Exaggerations [Free Republic]

NRO Staff on The Lies of Al Gore on National Review Online

Cool It - Bjørn Lomborg

Let's take a long, cool look at the dangers of global warming - Telegraph

Reason Magazine - Green with Ideology

Checklist for Global Warming

Environmentalism Is Anti-Life

I Was On the Global Warming Gravy Train

Human Control of the Global Climate

National Post

Nothing More Important Than Environmental Issues- by Jørn K ...

The Power Behind Kyoto

Warming or Cooling- You Be the Judge by Alvin Lowi, Jr.

The Other Corn-Fed Pork

Truth Is Inconvenient by George Giles

Environmentalism as Religion by John M. Ostrowski

The Globe Is Warming – and the Sky Is Falling by Jonathan Tarr

Michael Crichton by Charley Reese

LewRockwell.com Blog- A Billion Victims of Global Warming-

Don't Fret About Global Warming by Charley Reese

Toro! Toro! Michael Crichton by Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD

Global Warming Is Not a Threat But the Environmentalist Response ...

Myths of Global Warming by Carlo Stagnaro

The Global Warming Scam by Nima Sanandaji and Fred Goldberg

Global warming- the good news

Global warming- the good news

Global warming isn't all bad

More GreenLies

More Green Lies

Environmental Despotism

Liberals misquoted on oilsands policy

 

A National Center for Policy Analysis Project

 

"Nobody is interested in solutions if they don't think there's a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous (global warming) is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis," said Gore in a May 2006 interview with Grist Magazine.

_________________________________________________________

WILL AL GORE MELT?

If we are to embark on the costliest political project ever -- Al Gore's suggestions to combat global warming -- maybe we should make sure it rests on solid ground, say Flemming Rose, culture editor of the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, and Bjorn Lomborg, a professor at the Copenhagen Business School. 

First, the costs associated with Gore's plan need to be explored, say the authors:

bulletThe United Nations estimates that if we slowly change our greenhouse gas emissions over the coming century, we will live in a warmer but immensely richer world. 
bulletHowever, the U.N. Climate Panel suggests that if we follow Al Gore's path, by 2100 the average person will be 30 percent poorer.

Given the huge costs, it would be paramount to look at Gore's facts, which seem more convenient than accurate, says Rose and Lomborg:

bulletIn his movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore shows sequences of 20-feet flooding in Florida, San Francisco, New York, Beijing and others; yet the U.N. climate panel expects only a foot of sea-level rise over this century.
bulletGore also says global warming is bringing malaria to Nairobi; yet this is quite contrary to the World Health Organization's finding that Nairobi is considered free of malaria; but in the 1920s and 1930s, when temperatures were lower than today, malaria epidemics occurred regularly.
bulletIn Antarctica, Gore presents pictures from the 2 percent of Antarctica that is dramatically warming and ignores the 98 percent that has largely cooled over the past 35 years; he also ignores U.N. panel estimates that Antarctica will actually increase its snow mass this century.
bulletHe also says heat waves will cost lives, but says nothing about the fact that avoided cold deaths far outweigh the number of heat deaths.
bulletIn the United Kingdom, for example, it is estimated that 2,000 more will die from global warming, but 20,000 fewer will die of cold.

Source:  Flemming Rose And Bjorn Lomborg, "Will Al Gore Melt?" Wall Street Journal, January 18, 2007.

For text:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116909379096479919.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Essays on Capitalism and Socialism

 

 

Avoid the Rush by Chris Leithner

Some Truly GreatCanadians

Freedom and Democracy

What You Need to Know About the Minimum Wage

Paul Clark on stinkin' driver's licenses.

John R. Lott, Jr.: Archives

John R. Lott, Jr., on backfiring gun bans.

William L. Anderson writes Bill about HillaryCare.

The Subsistence Fund 

The Wages of Sinful Economic Arguments

 

 Web Watch
Recent news from the web

 

 

Bakken deposit may yield more oil

The Bakken Oil Formation- Our Next Oil Boom

Don't discount Saskatchewan's approach to fighting climate change

Race is on to get oil to Gulf Coast

Higher costs, red tape limit soaring oilsands spending

Mom & Pop Whitman focus on the Alberta’s oil sands

Responsible oilsands use helps us all

Don't let tar sand oil slip away

Booming West better able to weather economic turmoil- report

Mosaic to spend $3.15B to expand existing Saskatchewan mines

Saskatchewan is in good economic shape

'Saskatchewan is on a roll'

Unemployment rate is up, but don't worry about it

Alberta bucks trend in unemployment hike

Gore preaches climate gospel
This headline says it all. Its a new religion with these whackos.

Gore trains Canadians to teach his Inconvenient Truth
Why not, we have been listening to the same BS on CBC with Suzuki. Gore is so full of crap.

RIM Scoffs at 'R' Word With Doubled Profit, Revenue

In Croatia, Bush celebrates NATO expansion

Prime Minister silent after Auschwitz tour

 

Man gets 18 years for spreading HIV

Zimbabwe's ruling party demands vote recount

US-Russia row over Kosovo escalates with Moscow aid shipments

Serb nationalists warn Kosovo leaders

Kosovo Overshadows Montenegro Poll

"UNMIK main culprit for Haradinaj acquittal"

Labour shortage solutions

Numbers tell the truth- count on it

The Indivisibility of Kosovo: Principle of International Law
This guy's logic is almost as bad as Eric Margolis

NATO's Reign of Terror in Kosovo

Bush getsit right
An article by Eric Margolis
I am not sure which is more whacked, his logic or his facts. This idiot makes more stupid errors than a drunk in a boxing match. But then I have rarely read any of his work that made much logical sense.

The West

OilSands

Waiting for Ron Paul

Mises at Harvard

Heidi Remembers President Ron Paul's Election Victory (Part 2)

Ron Paul's Faith- Free Markets, Less Government

Commodity Bull Market Super Cycle - Ready to Rumble on in 2008

Hang in - high oil likely won't last

Low-energy bulbs 'worsen rashes'
This is a good example of unforeseen consequences, and why governments should stay out of the markets.

Big plans in pipeline for little Great Falls refinery

Scientists Admit Globe Cooling!!1!

Gore has profited from global warming

Global warming a big hoax

Repeat after us- `The sky is not falling, the sky . . .
Now this is something different for the Toronto Star.

Alberta in 2008
Here is an article by an obvious idiot.

Sask. prosperity ray of sun amid cloudy skies

Saskatchewan economy is anything but flat

$100 oil puts a new shine on Alberta

Saskatchewan ready to ride its own oilsands boom

PetroBank to expand oilsands projects, with THAI technology ...

Alberta sits out 'party' as oil breaks $100 US

CCRL plans to expand Saskatchewan refinery - Oil & Gas Journal

TransCanada plans $4 billion polygeneration plant for Saskatchewan – Journal of Commerce

New Sask. gov‘t plans to review oil royalty rates to compete with Alta. (Sask-Election-Oil) | Oilweek Magazine

Alberta premier urges oil sands firms to negotiate | Markets | Reuters

Canada's oil: black gold with a black heart - World - smh.com.au

globeandmail.com: Inside Energy - Oilsands Quest find looks for real

Oilsands Quest advances Axe Lake development - Oil & Gas Journal

Toxic stories

Very Political Science

Venezuela Decrees Nationalization of Last Foreign Controlled Oil ...

Boss of the Barrels

Exxon to cede oil project ops to Venezuela by May

Liberals – Real Life Underpants Gnomes

Venezuela’s Shift to the Left The Rising Left

Chavez claims Jesus as inspiration for socialist dictatorship

Envoy Warns Chavez About Oil Takeover

Chavez Calls for Dialogue on Socialism

Trust tax threatens to sell out Canada

Alta Premier Stelmach urges caution on Commons oilsands report
Can you spell NEP2?

Racism call as Cherokees expel sons of slaves

Controversial columnist draws fire for gay slur

Global warming- what can we do-
Enjoy it!

Al Qaeda rebuilding- Where does it stand-

Hugo Chávez's oil largesse winning fans around globe

Religion isn’ t the sickness. It’s the cure

I dialled 999 for an ambulance — and then waited

Now, Labour government thinks it can overrule all

William Rees-Mogg